@risottobias @buherator i really do wonder what sort of mindset one has to approach Rust from to call it inconsistent. It's, syntactically, a far more consistent language than any other i know.
Things like everything being expressions with the semicolon making a expression evaluate to () instead of a specific value and separating expressions into statements is a level of consistency i constantly wish for when writing other languages.
Other langs may have some destructuring/unpacking, but in Rust every assignment is pattern matching (let, loops, even function args).
While writing Rust, i think theres only one part where i couldn't follow and appreciate the reasoning for a sytanx being the way it is: cfg macros. I feel those should be using operators for and, or, not, etc. instead of what looks like function calls.
What i quite understand tho is that its a language which doesn't really follow the same logic as many of the popular langs, i had to actually learn the syntax instead of just seeing similarities