WebP has flaws as a format – don’t we all – but I think the commentary should be putting more blame on (1) the industry’s failure to standardize on (and rigorously reviews the implementations of) a single JPEG successor format, given the obvious hunger, and (2) the practice of implementing anything that reads nontrivial untrusted data in a programming language that is not memory-safe.
I’ve been surprised by the number of people popping up with “I always hated webp, the format I can never open properly”. I’m not saying that’s wrong.
But like … wepb is BSD-licensed and, as a lossy image format in the abstract, pretty okay.
The problems are mostly industry silliness (e.g., Apple being halfhearted about it without presenting a better alternative) and the fact that the reference implementation is in The Language Whose Creators Regretted Giving It That Fundamental Security Flaw.
@vruba I like webp! It's significantly smaller than JPG for the stuff I serve.