![The following are known processor manufacturer ID strings:
[highlighted portion says this:]
"GenuineIntel" – Intel
"GenuineIotel" – Intel (rare)[7][8]
[other items before that say:]
"AuthenticAMD" – AMD
"CentaurHauls" – IDT WinChip/Centaur (Including some VIA and Zhaoxin CPUs)
"CyrixInstead" – Cyrix/early STMicroelectronics and IBM](https://media.woem.space/media/0361c310047eb147acba0a90697ddf32388b77115cc4096e61731493d6b9bfc0.png "The following are known processor manufacturer ID strings:
[highlighted portion says this:]
\"GenuineIntel\" – Intel
\"GenuineIotel\" – Intel (rare)[7][8]
[other items before that say:]
\"AuthenticAMD\" – AMD
\"CentaurHauls\" – IDT WinChip/Centaur (Including some VIA and Zhaoxin CPUs)
\"CyrixInstead\" – Cyrix/early STMicroelectronics and IBM")
@astrid looks like a defective production run on Haswell era? There's lots of validated CPU-Z submissions
@directhex @astrid it happened twice lol
@directhex @astrid I don't remember the specific model, but I believe this was actually a known manufacturing mistake with specific runs of one particular Intel CPU where they actually made this mistake at the factory.
I think it was just a single bit difference in the ID string, but since this is their branding and such, that's pretty big for them.