Show more

good morning, here’s my new guitar

how do I know it’s mine?

it has my name on it 🤗

good morning, I just love Monday mornings because I get to catch up on all my emailsssssss

Good morning, can anyone confirm that shrink-wrapped bread is unique to America? Why do this? [cw food]

good morning, I found this guide to using `tar` very helpful [cw screaming Arnold Schwarzenegger face]

good morning to the profound absurdity and existential horror I found on my way out the door of my apartment building this morning [cw ec]

good morning, let's check in on how the normies are doing... [cw pol]

good morning. props to Java developers for having such a good sense of humour about their, quite frankly, horrifying language

@ashfurrow The language is simple enough. The ecosystem and API ("standard library") are pure insanity.

Every so often a new solution comes along that has everyone jump on a bandwagon and sing hallelujah! But it hides the fact that at its base language design level, java makes O.O.P. really, really hard and cumbersome.

@aeveltstra that's an interesting perspective. If I may ask, isn't that the goal of the JVM as a compile target? So that languages like Scala and Clojure can take advantage of Java's popularity without having to use the actual syntax?

(Not that Scala isn't a difficult language, too!)

@ashfurrow Yes, it is. And then these other JVM-targeting languages have to build their own API, via which they show, that they hadn't planned for that, and just wind up making a big mess.

It's like how creating a new language is fun. But the ecosystem around it, to male that language practical to use? That's hard work.

@aeveltstra gotcha, that makes sense. Do you think this is why we (I) hear more success stories with languages compiling to the .Net CLR than compiling to the JVM? Because it was designed to be agnostic to languages from the start? (Not that it doesn't have to be hacky about adding support for new constructs, too.)

@ashfurrow I have on-hands experience with several .Net languages. Yes: the CLR does not appear to suffer the exact same issues. It suffers whole other ones.
Inside Powershell for instance, we can mix paradigms in the same script: functional, o.o., procedural, and maybe event-driven too (legacy VB was event-driven and moved from procedural to o.o. over time) - 1/2

Follow

@ashfurrow

But depending of the version of your script engine and the source version of an invoked library, Powershell may force us to employ a different, unwanted paradigm. And apart from finding a different library to invoke, there's literally nothing we can do.

That is not Powershell's fault, as far as I could determine, but the CLR. - 2/2

@aeveltstra interesting – I hadn't realized the different paradigms targeting the same runtime would add such complexity!

Sign in to participate in the conversation
LGBTQIA+ Tech Mastodon

This Mastodon instance is for tech workers, academics, students, and others interested in tech who are LGBTQIA+ or Allies.